NLP House
NLP House - a place for learning and coaching


Cumulative update packages for Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 contain hotfixes for the Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 issues that have been fixed since the release of Windows SharePoint Services 3.0.Description of the Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 cumulative update package: February 24, 2009


Status updates on sites such as Facebook, Yammer, Twitter and Friendfeed are a new form of communication, the South by SouthWest Festival has heard.
"We are all in the process of creating e-mail 2.0," David Sacks, founder of business social network Yammer said.
Tens of millions of people are using social networks to stay in touch.
The growth in such services is being heralded as the start of the real-time, pervasive web.
'New communication'
Mr Sacks said: "What people want to do on social network these days is post status updates. We think it's all people want to do."
Yammer is an enterprise social network, designed to facilitate communication within companies and organisations.
It is one of a growing number of services that lets users share micro-updates. Other services have a richer mix of content, including sharing photos and video, and allowing comments from people within your social network, building a so-called activity stream.
"I think it's a new form of communication; not quite e-mail, more lightweight and more real time, often with little bit of a publishing flavour to it," said Paul Buchheit, founder of FriendFeed, and the creator and lead developer of GMail, while at Google.
FriendFeed lets users share content from other services, such as Twitter and Flickr, and comment directly on the postings in real-time.
Simplicity and ubiquity
With more than 175 million users Facebook is the dominant platform for status updates.
Ari Steinberg, an engineering manager at the firm, told BBC News: "It's been interesting to see the way people change the way they communicate.
"You used to e-mail content to people and you had to choose who you wanted to e-mail it to and you didn't know if your friends even wanted to see it.
"Now you can passively put something out there and let people engage with it."
The simplicity and ubiquity of some of these services is beginning to see activity feeds and status updates replace many of the uses to which e-mail was once put.
Mr Sacks said: "It's no coincidence that these products are all looking like e-mail.
"These products are all standardising around a message form at the top, and the inbox which is a feed then folders around the side."
'Open system'
The problem with the current crop of status update services is that they are to varying degrees interoperable.
For example, while Twitter can be used to power a status update on Facebook the same is not true in reverse.
"We want to see a more open system where everything links together, the same as it does with e-mail," he said.
While e-mail has common protocols which allow people to send and receive messages even if they are with different services, such as Hotmail or GMail, the same is not completely true with status updates and activity feeds.
There are some standard protocols but the rapid development in the complexity and breadth of activity feeds, to include comments and ratings, has led to a series of walled gardens.
Dare Obasanjo, a program manager at Microsoft, said the firm was working on a set of standards.
"You need to give sites permission to get your data," he said.
'Hard to compete'
The complex nuances of relationships on social networks, with users having different degrees of openness with different friends or followers, further complicates the introduction of standards.
Facebook has also been accused of being unwilling to open up its system and work with other status update firms, and there is a belief among some that the social network is enacting a "land grab" in an effort to become the de-facto platform.
Mr Sacks said: "On the consumer side Facebook could become the one site for all social messaging. That becomes very hard to compete with."
But Mr Buccheit said he believed the different firms were moving towards a more federated system.
"There will be no separation between Facebook and Friendfeed and Twitter."
Mr Steinberg said: "We are totally happy to interoperate with other sites."
He told BBC News that interoperability wasn't necessary for activity streams to become a global messaging service.
"It's definitely something and a pretty cool thing we would like to enable. Conceptually it makes a lot of sense.
"It's in our interests to let people share. Twitter has had a lot of success in letting people taking their data and sharing it externally.
"We'd love to be able to let people tap into that."
Today I relieved something when I was looking for a shop me and my wife found last weekend. As I was finding it I saw clearly that I am good at remember not because I have some attribute called "memory" but rather because I am kind of a arrogant gutsy person who is willing to push his vision and in time find his way.
If you asked me the best attribute you need in getting a SharePoint take-on I would say guts, you need the guts first to ask people to change the way they work, to get people to work together in a culture run by the ideology of utter independence. We are trained to think we work alone and SharePoint reminds people that value is collaboration.
You also need the guts to do it right. SharePoint has some great ways to do things, like BI in Excel Services and wikis, but you need the guts to use the right tool for the right end.
If the requirements are meet by Excel services you need to stick to your guns and use Excel Services.
Just had a facebook chat with a friend who is using SharePont for a massive US company. One thing that came up was that many firms use content management to store massive Excel docs with links to SQL databases.
Just to rant a bit, this SHOULD be done using a BI feature: ProClarity, Reporting Services, or Excel Services. Companies fail too provide proper support with SharePoint rollouts.
To a company using MOSS please get a Gold Partner and Strategic Partner. Try to find someone who can do more than just listen and say yes. These days IT consultants are told to listen and collect requirements. Is this what you need? If you are like 90% of firms I have seen you need someone to tell you how you should do it. Get a partner or, if you can find them, staff who have the guts and knowledge to guide a true MOSS takeup.